Lincoln Albert Loud (voiced by Sean Ryan Fox in the pilot "Bathroom Break!!", Grant Palmer in S1E1A-S1E22B, Collin Dean in S1E23A-S3E18A, singing voice by Jackson Petty in S3E17, Tex Hammond in S3E18B-S4E21B, Asher Bishop in S4E23A-S6E3A, Bentley Griffin in S6E4-Present and Nickelodeon All-Star Brawl, portrayed by Wolfgang Schaeffer in A Loud House Christmas and The Really Loud House, Justin Allan as a young boy in The Really Loud House) is an 11-year-old boy (12-year-old season 5 onward and The Really Loud House) with white hair who is the middle child and the only son in the Loud family. For the American band, see The Loud Family. And certainly, there are some fringe ideas that were once unsupported by high quality sources that have such become legitimized and more mainstream."Loud family" and "The Loud family" redirect here. Cryptid enthusiasts, like anti-vaxxers and conspiracy theorists, take issue with this, essentially arguing that Wikipedia's editors are simply replicating the elite institutional authorities that have historically suppressed knowledge to support their own agendas or biases. The value of Wikipedia is supposed to be in the communal acceptance of truth - a source of information based on a decentralized consensus, rather than a single, institutional authority that may have its own agenda or biases. Like I said, there is an interesting issue at play here. "The sources that you have to use have to be secondary, notable, and have journalistic integrity," she said. We're not making up the word," said Susan Gerbic, who leads Guerilla Skepticism on Wikipedia, a volunteer association of editors who seek to monitor the site's content for claims that go against the body of scientific evidence. "We call it is pseudoscience because that's what the citations tell us to use. But these words infuriate serious Bigfoot believers, who claim that Wikipedia should be softer and more neutral in its language.Īccording to experienced Wikipedians, the best way to counter a neutrality argument from the Cryptids Are Real side is to focus on Wikipedia's core policies, especially the requirement to reflect reliable sources. That's exactly the kind of language that appears on the Bigfoot article, which is sprinkled with descriptors like pseudoscience, hoax, folklore, and wishful thinking. Rather than "gatekeep" the cryptids, Van Epps and Miller suggested the page instead feature a disclaimer saying that the topic it not accepted by mainstream science. So when Wikipedians reclassify a creature as folklore rather than a cryptid, then that subject no longer has the same visibility for information seekers. Their listeners will also suggest a cryptid to cover by linking to its Wikipedia page. Before they make a cryptid episode, they usually check the topic on Wikipedia and review the collection of sources collected at the bottom of an article. The answer is not necessarily to gatekeep what is and isn't a cryptid," said Cristina Van Epps, who co-hosts the popular Cults, Cryptids & Conspiracies podcast with her friend Chelsea Miller, and typically takes the skeptical point of view. Slate tried to get to the center of this controversy - and it's an interesting discussion.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |